btn toggle

Galerie

Gallery » Danzig Report Nr. 100 » PART III -THE LARGE INNENDIENST, FORGERIES OF THE 1-MARK INNENDIENST

 

PART III -THE LARGE INNENDIENST
FORGERIES OF THE 1-MARK INNENDIENST


FORGERY ID-1-1
1. Lithographic forgery: Vienna No.1.
2. Face of I) is too strong.
3. Flame line of I) doesn’t touch the top.
4. Left side of a is too fat.
5. Verticals of n are too far apart.
6. The I is too thin.
7. Top loop of g Is too wide.
8. Ends of horizontal bar are deeply bowed.

FORGERY lD-1-2
1. Lithographic forgety: Vienna No.2.
2. Danzig is too deep.
3. The D is too high arid narrow.
4. Top of a is too narrow.
5. The n has no nose.
6. Bottom loop of z and g are too rounded.
7. The I is too strong; bottom of dot is pointed.

FORGERY lD-1-3
1 Point of origin: Lausanne.
2.Type face shows strong deviation thruout.
3. Ilorizontal bar is solid and rectangular.
4. Sharp edge at bottom of D.
5. [)ot over the i Is angular, comma-shaped.
6. Lead-In angle of a is non-tangental; sharp angle of line leaving the a.

 

Danzig Report Vol. 1 - Nr. 100 - July - August - September - 1998, Page 14.


Hits: 1774

Added: 22/07/2015
Copyright: 2024 Danzig.org

Danzig